Composing Semantics Matchers
Communityskydoves
Use this skill to build precise Compose UI test queries by composing `SemanticsMatcher` predicates with `infix and`, `infix or`, and `operator not`, plus the prebuilt filter library (`hasText`, `hasClickAction`, `isEnabled`, `isOn`, `hasTestTag`, `hasContentDescription`, `hasParent`, `hasAnyAncestor`, `hasAnyChild`, `hasAnySibling`, `hasAnyDescendant`, `hasImeAction`, `hasScrollToKeyAction`, `hasScrollToNodeAction`, `isDialog`, `isPopup`, `isRoot`, `isFocused`, `isEditable`, `isHeading`). Covers `SemanticsMatcher.expectValue` / `keyIsDefined` / `keyNotDefined` for custom semantics keys. Use when the developer asks how to find "an enabled button with text Submit", how to combine matchers, how to filter by a custom `SemanticsPropertyKey`, how to write a hierarchical predicate, or mentions `hasParent`, `hasAnyAncestor`, `expectValue`. If the developer wants one matcher instead of three chained assertions, use this skill.
Overview
- Repository
- skydoves/android-testing-skills
- Publisher
- skydoves
- Stars
- 347
- Forks
- 14
- Bundled files
- 0
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Updated
- May 25, 2026
Installation
tmp=$(mktemp -d)
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skydoves/android-testing-skills.git "$tmp"
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -R "$tmp/compose/finders/composing-semantics-matchers" ~/.claude/skills/composing-semantics-matchers
rm -rf "$tmp"tmp=$(mktemp -d)
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skydoves/android-testing-skills.git "$tmp"
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills
cp -R "$tmp/compose/finders/composing-semantics-matchers" ~/.codex/skills/composing-semantics-matchers
rm -rf "$tmp"Install the Composing Semantics Matchers agent skill from https://github.com/skydoves/android-testing-skills/tree/main/compose/finders/composing-semantics-matchers into this project's skills folder.Instructions
Composing Semantics Matchers — One Matcher, One Error
A SemanticsMatcher is a description string plus a (SemanticsNode) -> Boolean predicate (SemanticsMatcher.kt:26). Compose ships with a rich filter library and three combinators (and, or, not) that produce a single matcher whose error message lists every clause. This skill picks the right factory, composes precise predicates, and replaces brittle assertion chains.
When to use this skill
- The developer wants to find "an enabled Button with text Submit" or any node matching multiple constraints.
- The developer asks how to combine
hasTextandhasClickAction, or how to negate a matcher withnot. - The developer needs to filter by a custom
SemanticsPropertyKey(e.g. a domain-specific role) usingexpectValue/keyIsDefined. - The developer asks about hierarchical matchers like
hasParent,hasAnyAncestor,hasAnyChild,hasAnySibling,hasAnyDescendant. - A test chains multiple
assertIs*calls and the developer wants a single, declarative predicate.
When NOT to use this skill
- The query is "find by tag/text/content description only" — use
../finding-nodes-by-tag-text-content/SKILL.md. - The right node exists but only as a relative — use
../traversing-the-semantics-tree/SKILL.md. - The matcher is fine; only the assertions need rework — see
../../assertions/asserting-node-state-and-text/SKILL.md.
Prerequisites
androidx.compose.ui:ui-teston the test classpath. See../../setup/configuring-test-dependencies/SKILL.mdif unresolved.- Comfort with
Modifier.semantics { … }in production code. Custom keys must be set viaModifier.semantics { customKey = value }to be matchable from tests.
Workflow
1. Build matchers from the prebuilt filter library. Every prebuilt matcher lives in
commonMain/.../Filters.kt. Group by signal:Signal Matchers File:line Enabled / disabled isEnabled(),isNotEnabled()Filters.kt:38-47Toggle (Switch, Checkbox) isToggleable(),isOn(),isOff()Filters.kt:54-70Selection (Tab, RadioButton) isSelectable(),isSelected(),isNotSelected()Filters.kt:77-93Focus isFocusable(),isNotFocusable(),isFocused(),isNotFocused()Filters.kt:100-122Click action hasClickAction(),hasNoClickAction()Filters.kt:129-136Scroll action hasScrollAction(),hasNoScrollAction(),hasScrollToIndexAction(),hasScrollToKeyAction(),hasScrollToNodeAction()Filters.kt:143-425Text actions (TextField) hasSetTextAction(),hasInsertTextAtCursorAction(),hasPerformImeAction(),hasImeAction(ImeAction)Filters.kt:365-392Focus action hasRequestFocusAction()Filters.kt:399Content description hasContentDescription(value, substring, ignoreCase),hasContentDescriptionExactly(vararg)Filters.kt:165-212Text hasText(text, substring, ignoreCase),hasTextExactly(vararg, includeEditableText=true)Filters.kt:229-293A11y / state metadata hasStateDescription,hasProgressBarRangeInfo,isHeading,isDialog,isPopup,isHiddenFromAccessibility,isEditable,isRootFilters.kt:301-439Test tag hasTestTag(testTag)Filters.kt:326-327Hierarchical hasParent(matcher),hasAnyChild(matcher),hasAnySibling(matcher),hasAnyAncestor(matcher),hasAnyDescendant(matcher)Filters.kt:446-530hasTextsearchesSemanticsProperties.Text,SemanticsProperties.EditableText, ANDSemanticsProperties.InputTextsimultaneously (Filters.kt:229-258).hasContentDescriptionmatches against the merged list of descriptions (Filters.kt:165-188).2. Compose with
and/or/not. Combinators come fromSemanticsMatcher.kt:60-74. Each produces a new matcher whosedescriptionreads(left) && (right)/(left) || (right)/NOT (inner). The framework prints this description verbatim on assertion failure, so the failure message shows exactly which clause(s) failed.3. Use
SemanticsMatcher.expectValuefor custom keys. When the production code declares a customSemanticsPropertyKey<T>and writes it viaModifier.semantics { customKey = value }, match it withSemanticsMatcher.expectValue(customKey, expectedValue)(SemanticsMatcher.kt:33-37). For "this key is set at all", useSemanticsMatcher.keyIsDefined(customKey)(SemanticsMatcher.kt:40-42); for "this key is NOT set", usekeyNotDefined(SemanticsMatcher.kt:45-47). Built-in matchers likeisOn()are themselves thin wrappers overexpectValue(SemanticsProperties.ToggleableState, On)(Filters.kt:61-62).4. Pass the composed matcher to
onNode/onAllNodes.onNode(matcher, useUnmergedTree=false)andonAllNodes(matcher, useUnmergedTree=false)are the canonical entry points (SemanticsNodeInteractionsProvider.kt). BothonNodeWithTagand friends are convenience wrappers — drop them when the predicate gets richer.5. For hierarchical assertions, prefer
hasAnyAncestor/hasAnyDescendantover multiple traversal steps. Example: "find the Text inside the dialog" →onNode(hasText("Discard?") and hasAnyAncestor(isDialog())). Cleaner thanonAllNodes(isDialog()).onFirst().onChildren().filter(hasText(...)).onFirst().
Patterns
Pattern: replace assertion chains with a single matcher
// WRONG
@Test
fun submit_isEnabledClickable() {
rule.setContent { CheckoutScreen() }
rule.onNodeWithText("Submit")
.assertHasClickAction()
.assertIsEnabled()
}
// WRONG because: each assertion is a separate fetch + error path. Failure prints "no click
// action" without telling the developer the matched node is the *enabled-but-wrong* button on
// a different screen.// RIGHT
@Test
fun submit_isEnabledClickable() {
rule.setContent { CheckoutScreen() }
rule.onNode(hasText("Submit") and hasClickAction() and isEnabled())
.assertExists()
}The composed matcher's description prints (Text + InputText + EditableText contains 'Submit' (ignoreCase: false)) && (OnClick is defined) && (is enabled) on failure, naming every unsatisfied clause.
Pattern: hierarchical match — "the Text inside the dialog"
// WRONG
rule.onAllNodes(isDialog())
.onFirst()
.onChildren()
.filterToOne(hasText("Discard?"))
.assertIsDisplayed()
// WRONG because: it implicitly assumes the Text is a direct child of the dialog root.
// AlertDialog wraps its body in Column/Surface, so the Text is a descendant, not a child.// RIGHT
rule.onNode(hasText("Discard?") and hasAnyAncestor(isDialog()))
.assertIsDisplayed()Pattern: negation and "exactly one"
// "An enabled, non-toggleable Button (so: not a Switch or Checkbox) with text Submit"
rule.onNode(hasText("Submit") and isEnabled() and !isToggleable())
.assertHasClickAction()!matcher invokes operator fun not() (SemanticsMatcher.kt:72-74) — works on every matcher in the library.
Pattern: custom semantics key
// production:
val PriorityKey = SemanticsPropertyKey<Int>("Priority")
var SemanticsPropertyReceiver.priority by PriorityKey
@Composable
fun TaskRow(task: Task) {
Row(modifier = Modifier
.testTag(TaskRowTag)
.semantics { priority = task.priority }
) { /* … */ }
}
// test:
rule.onNode(hasTestTag(TaskRowTag) and SemanticsMatcher.expectValue(PriorityKey, 1))
.assertIsDisplayed()
// "this row has a priority assigned at all":
rule.onNode(hasTestTag(TaskRowTag) and SemanticsMatcher.keyIsDefined(PriorityKey))
.assertIsDisplayed()Pattern: dropdown / IME-action / scroll-to-key — narrow a TextField query
// "the editable TextField that handles Done as IME action"
rule.onNode(hasSetTextAction() and hasImeAction(ImeAction.Done))
.performTextInput("hello")
// "any LazyColumn child reachable by key — i.e. has IndexForKey on top of ScrollToIndex"
rule.onNode(hasScrollToKeyAction()).performScrollToKey(itemKey)hasScrollToKeyAction is the conjunction hasKey(ScrollToIndex) and hasKey(IndexForKey) (Filters.kt:415-416). hasScrollToNodeAction adds an axis-range check (Filters.kt:419-425).
Pattern: matcher description appears in error messages
val matcher = hasText("Submit") and hasClickAction() and isEnabled()
println(matcher.description)
// (Text + InputText + EditableText contains 'Submit' (ignoreCase: false)) &&
// (OnClick is defined) && (is enabled)The description is human-readable and used by assert(matcher) (Assertions.kt:254-267) when the matcher does not hold. Clauses MUST be readable in isolation — that is why named matchers are preferred over inline lambdas.
Mandatory rules
- MUST use
infix and/infix or/operator notto compose matchers; MUST NOT chainassertIs*calls when a single composed matcher captures the same intent. - MUST wrap custom semantics keys with
SemanticsMatcher.expectValue(...)orSemanticsMatcher.keyIsDefined(...); MUST NOT accessnode.config[CustomKey]from inside an ad-hoc lambda. The factory methods produce readable error descriptions. - MUST prefer
hasAnyAncestor(isDialog())/hasAnyDescendant(...)over multi-step traversal when the relationship is "somewhere above/below". Cross-reference:../traversing-the-semantics-tree/SKILL.md. - MUST keep the
useUnmergedTreeflag at its defaultfalseunless the matcher targets an inner element collapsed by merge. Skydoves hot take #2. - MUST NOT redefine an existing prebuilt matcher (e.g. writing a custom
SemanticsMatcher("is enabled") { … }) — useisEnabled(). Custom matchers are reserved for keys that don't have a prebuilt filter. - PREFERRED: prefer tag-anchored matchers —
hasTestTag(SubmitTag) and isEnabled()— over text-anchored. Skydoves hot take #1.
Verification
- Every multi-condition query uses one
onNode(matcher)rather than chained finders + assertions. - Custom key checks use
SemanticsMatcher.expectValue/keyIsDefined—node.config[...]does not appear in matcher predicates. -
./gradlew :app:connectedDebugAndroidTestor:app:testDebugUnitTestpasses. - Failure messages from intentionally-broken matchers print the composed
descriptionso the failing clause is identifiable. - No matcher is silently shadowed by a re-declared local lambda with the same name.
References
- Compose testing overview: https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/testing
- Compose testing cheat sheet: https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/testing-cheatsheet
- Semantics in Compose: https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/accessibility/semantics
compose/ui/ui-test/src/commonMain/kotlin/androidx/compose/ui/test/SemanticsMatcher.kt—class SemanticsMatcher,expectValue/keyIsDefined/keyNotDefined,infix and,infix or,operator not.compose/ui/ui-test/src/commonMain/kotlin/androidx/compose/ui/test/Filters.kt— every prebuilt matcher (state, action, text, hierarchical).compose/ui/ui-test/src/commonMain/kotlin/androidx/compose/ui/test/Assertions.kt—fun assert(matcher, messagePrefixOnError)and how the matcher description surfaces in errors.compose/ui/ui-test/src/commonMain/kotlin/androidx/compose/ui/test/SemanticsNodeInteractionsProvider.kt—onNode(matcher, useUnmergedTree)/onAllNodes(matcher, useUnmergedTree).
FAQ
What does Composing Semantics Matchers do?
Use this skill to build precise Compose UI test queries by composing `SemanticsMatcher` predicates with `infix and`, `infix or`, and `operator not`, plus the prebuilt filter library (`hasText`, `hasClickAction`, `isEnabled`, `isOn`, `hasTestTag`, `hasContentDescription`, `hasParent`, `hasAnyAncestor`, `hasAnyChild`, `hasAnySibling`, `hasAnyDescendant`, `hasImeAction`, `hasScrollToKeyAction`, `hasScrollToNodeAction`, `isDialog`, `isPopup`, `isRoot`, `isFocused`, `isEditable`, `isHeading`). Covers `SemanticsMatcher.expectValue` / `keyIsDefined` / `keyNotDefined` for custom semantics keys. Use when the developer asks how to find "an enabled button with text Submit", how to combine matchers, how to filter by a custom `SemanticsPropertyKey`, how to write a hierarchical predicate, or mentions `hasParent`, `hasAnyAncestor`, `expectValue`. If the developer wants one matcher instead of three chained assertions, use this skill.
Who made Composing Semantics Matchers?
skydoves (a community member) publishes it in the skydoves/android-testing-skills repository on GitHub.
Is Composing Semantics Matchers free?
Yes. Composing Semantics Matchers is open source, published by skydoves under the Apache-2.0 license.
What comes with Composing Semantics Matchers?
Just its instructions. Everything the agent needs is in one SKILL.md file.
Which agents can use Composing Semantics Matchers?
Any coding agent that reads SKILL.md files, including Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Gemini CLI. The agent loads the skill when a task matches its description.
What are agent skills?
An agent skill is a folder with a SKILL.md file: instructions that teach a coding agent how to do one kind of task, and optionally files it can read while it works. The agent keeps only the skill's name and description in mind and reads the rest when a task calls for it.
How are agent skills different from MCP servers?
An MCP server gives an agent new tools to call, code that runs somewhere and returns results. A skill gives it knowledge: how to approach a task with the tools it already has. Many agents use both.
How can my agent test my Android app?
Robomori lets coding agents create, start and control Android emulators and devices from one command, so they can install your app, take screenshots and check dark mode, font sizes and languages.